The thrust that comes from this method is too little to de-orbit any kind of debris, but it is just enough to help nudge it away from a collision.Īblation: Using a powerful laser to cut into space junk.When a photon (or light, essentially) bounces off an object, it transfers a small amount of that momentum to the object. But while photons are massless, they do carry a small amount of momentum.A photon is an elementary particle that represents a “quantum of light,” and therefore, they have no mass. With the photon pressure technology, lasers nudge debris to ensure collisions don’t happen.In its report, NASA focused on two different laser technologies to help manage space junk from a distance-photon pressure and ablation.Lasers can exert force on debris in space without making any physical contact. From near-miss “worst-case” space disasters to the International Space Station constantly having to move out of the way of space junk, the space debris crisis has prompted concern from both governments and businesses, as well as the scientific community. Our planet has a huge space debris problem. NASA’s new report weighs the pros and cons of using lasers and “sweeper spacecraft” to help clear space junk. Lasers and sweeper spacecraft for space junk UK has condemned the event and promised to take the security of the Indian High Commission in London seriously.India finds the UK government’s indifference to the security of Indian diplomatic premises and personnel in the UK unacceptable.The fact that protestors were able to climb the walls of the High Commission premises indicates a breach.Part 2 of this article states that “The receiving State is under a special duty to take all appropriate steps to protect the premises of the mission against any intrusion or damage and to prevent any disturbance of the peace of the mission or impairment of its dignity”.ĭid the UK not fulfil its obligations in this instance?.Article 22 of the Convention deals with obligations with regards to the premises of the Mission.As per the Vienna Convention, a “receiving State” refers to the host nation where a diplomatic mission is located.Obligations of a “receiving State” under the Vienna Convention Here is a list of some of the most well-known Vienna Conventions: Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961) Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969) Vienna Convention on Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage (1977) Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties (1978) Vienna Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (1987) Vienna Convention on the Protection of the Ozone Layer (1985) Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone Layer (1985) Note that there may be other treaties or agreements that have been signed in Vienna that may also be referred to as Vienna Conventions, but the above are some of the most commonly recognized ones. There are several conventions that are named as “Vienna Convention”.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |